Defendant has claimed he "won" in court and convinced the court what he was saying was TRUE and he had proven his claims

He didn't. There was no hearing in which to offer any evidence.

DEFENDANT PLEADED GUILTY

In the Provincial Court of Alberta, Judicial District of Edmonton, an agreed statement of facts was presented to the Court in the matter of Her Majesty the Queen v John Hans Anderson. To avoid a trial (hearing), John Anderson admitted a number of facts in order to dispense with the need for formal 'proof' needing to be presented to the Court. Those facts are detailed in a document dated October 29, 2019. Now, having no need to attend a trial hearing, the defendant will only need to attend a Sentencing Hearing which we understand is set down for March 31, 2020.

For those viewers who have been listening to Anderson's protestations of innocence - know now that his protests were lies and he was not innocent. He expressed wrath upon his victims, threatened to kill and cause bodily harm to his victims, and named bullets for his victims. He scoffed at jail sentencing, and told his audience that he intended to put his victims "six feet under". Those are the actions of a cyber-stalker and online terrorist.

If you have heard Anderson say that it has been "proven in a Court of law" that he was right, that (among other things) John Aster was a pedophile and that Mark W. Mumma was pro-pedo - again, know that Mr. Anderson lied. There was no court hearing. There was no trial. Anderson took a plea bargain to get a reduced sentence and avoid a lengthy trial.

This concludes our discussion on the matter of Mr. John Hans Anderson. It has been proven that he is a cyber-stalker, an online terrorist, and a liar.